2000 Mules
- Thread starter cjpayne
- Start date
joel1234567
Active Member
I like this idea that if the news isn't reporting something, it's true. If they are reporting it, it's fake. Please tell me more.
Let's try it out... I'm the smartest man alive. Yup, haven't heard that on the news, so, yeah. CNN isn't talking about it. Pretty sure there was some info about it on Hunter Biden's laptop, but the FBI isn't talking either. Just the fact that so many people aren't talking about it clearly means it's true. The cover up is obviously huge- at all levels. When I decide it's time to disseminate this information I'll have to spin up a few real high quality websites and put the bots to work on the tweetspaces, spewing out the truth. And, finally, the eyes of the public will be opened.
You heard it here first. That's why I like this website the best, it's got the best truths. And to think I used to just come here to learn about bikes, not how the real world operates. Crazy.
Let's try it out... I'm the smartest man alive. Yup, haven't heard that on the news, so, yeah. CNN isn't talking about it. Pretty sure there was some info about it on Hunter Biden's laptop, but the FBI isn't talking either. Just the fact that so many people aren't talking about it clearly means it's true. The cover up is obviously huge- at all levels. When I decide it's time to disseminate this information I'll have to spin up a few real high quality websites and put the bots to work on the tweetspaces, spewing out the truth. And, finally, the eyes of the public will be opened.
You heard it here first. That's why I like this website the best, it's got the best truths. And to think I used to just come here to learn about bikes, not how the real world operates. Crazy.
The 208
Active Member
For petes sake Kirb put your monkey away. Trump is going to answer some question. AFAIK he won't be under oath. Geeze one would think that a horrible criminal like Trump, after what, 6 years, would be charged with SOMETHING!
If %10 of the effort trying to pin a crime on the trump family was put into investigating the Biden family, well, some heads would roll.
If %10 of the effort trying to pin a crime on the trump family was put into investigating the Biden family, well, some heads would roll.
The 208
Active Member
Here from your favorite "news" source. I'm pretty sure that they don't report in t.v where biggest eaters of paste dwell. I can't sit and watch it all day so......Kirrby can probably fill us in on that.
www.cnn.com
Michael Sussmann
(CNN)The jury in the trial of Michael Sussmann, the Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer charged by special counsel John Durham as part of his inquiry into the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia probe, will resume deliberations on Tuesday.
Sussmann is charged with one felony count of making a false statement to the FBI. The 12-member jury, made up of seven women and five men, and contains five people of color, deliberated for roughly four hours Friday before leaving for the three-day weekend.
Special counsel prosecutors argued there is "overwhelming" evidence that Sussmann "concealed" Clinton campaign ties and cloaked his work under the guise of cybersecurity to peddle an unfounded Trump-Russia tip to the FBI.
"It wasn't about national security," prosecutor Jonathan Algor told the jury. "It was about promoting opposition research about the opposition candidate, Donald Trump."
Takeaways from a critical witness in the John Durham probe's first trial
Prosecutors allege that Sussman lied to then-FBI general counsel James Baker on September 19, 2016, while passing along a tip about possible connections between the Trump Organization and Kremlin-linked Alfa Bank. Sussmann is accused of falsely telling Baker that he wasn't there on behalf of any client, even though, according to Durham, he was there on Clinton's behalf. (The FBI didn't find any illicit activity after a four-month probe.)
The case is the first major courtroom test for Durham, the Trump-era prosecutor who has spent three years looking for misconduct in the FBI's Russia probe, but hasn't delivered the bombshell indictments that Trump has predicted.
https://lilhonda.com/javascript:void(0)
A conviction might boost Durham's credibility, while an acquittal could vindicate his critics, who say he's running a politicized probe into flimsy theories.
Sussmann's lawyers accused Durham on Friday of trying to "misdirect" the jury by coaching and coercing witnesses to secure a conviction in a case that "doesn't make any sense at all" and "should've never been brought" in the first place.
"The time for political conspiracy theories is over," defense attorney Sean Berkowitz said during closing arguments. "The time to talk about the evidence is now."
He claimed Durham "tried to break" a key witness by threatening prosecution, and cherry-picked a massive trove of emails and government documents to fit his case against Sussmann.
"Any piece of evidence that doesn't fit their tunnel-vision theory, they ignore," Berkowitz said.
He also rebutted the prosecution's focus on "opposition research" during its closing statements, which meticulously showed how Sussmann worked with the Clinton campaign's top lawyer and researchers funded by the campaign to collect and peddle anti-Trump material to the media.
LOL FIFTH AMMENDMENT...FIFTH AMMENDMENT....FIFTH AMMENDMENT....
Turley is by no means a fan of Trump but he is a fan of the constitution and rule of law. He likes those more than he hates trump. Which is more than can be said of a lot of people.
Jury to resume deliberations Tuesday in trial of former Hillary Clinton lawyer Michael Sussmann | CNN Politics
The jury in the trial of Michael Sussmann, the Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer charged by special counsel John Durham as part of his inquiry into the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia probe, will resume deliberations on Tuesday.
www.cnn.com
Michael Sussmann
(CNN)The jury in the trial of Michael Sussmann, the Hillary Clinton campaign lawyer charged by special counsel John Durham as part of his inquiry into the origins of the FBI's Trump-Russia probe, will resume deliberations on Tuesday.
Sussmann is charged with one felony count of making a false statement to the FBI. The 12-member jury, made up of seven women and five men, and contains five people of color, deliberated for roughly four hours Friday before leaving for the three-day weekend.
Special counsel prosecutors argued there is "overwhelming" evidence that Sussmann "concealed" Clinton campaign ties and cloaked his work under the guise of cybersecurity to peddle an unfounded Trump-Russia tip to the FBI.
"It wasn't about national security," prosecutor Jonathan Algor told the jury. "It was about promoting opposition research about the opposition candidate, Donald Trump."
Takeaways from a critical witness in the John Durham probe's first trial
Prosecutors allege that Sussman lied to then-FBI general counsel James Baker on September 19, 2016, while passing along a tip about possible connections between the Trump Organization and Kremlin-linked Alfa Bank. Sussmann is accused of falsely telling Baker that he wasn't there on behalf of any client, even though, according to Durham, he was there on Clinton's behalf. (The FBI didn't find any illicit activity after a four-month probe.)
The case is the first major courtroom test for Durham, the Trump-era prosecutor who has spent three years looking for misconduct in the FBI's Russia probe, but hasn't delivered the bombshell indictments that Trump has predicted.
https://lilhonda.com/javascript:void(0)
A conviction might boost Durham's credibility, while an acquittal could vindicate his critics, who say he's running a politicized probe into flimsy theories.
Sussmann's lawyers accused Durham on Friday of trying to "misdirect" the jury by coaching and coercing witnesses to secure a conviction in a case that "doesn't make any sense at all" and "should've never been brought" in the first place.
"The time for political conspiracy theories is over," defense attorney Sean Berkowitz said during closing arguments. "The time to talk about the evidence is now."
He claimed Durham "tried to break" a key witness by threatening prosecution, and cherry-picked a massive trove of emails and government documents to fit his case against Sussmann.
"Any piece of evidence that doesn't fit their tunnel-vision theory, they ignore," Berkowitz said.
He also rebutted the prosecution's focus on "opposition research" during its closing statements, which meticulously showed how Sussmann worked with the Clinton campaign's top lawyer and researchers funded by the campaign to collect and peddle anti-Trump material to the media.
LOL FIFTH AMMENDMENT...FIFTH AMMENDMENT....FIFTH AMMENDMENT....
Turley is by no means a fan of Trump but he is a fan of the constitution and rule of law. He likes those more than he hates trump. Which is more than can be said of a lot of people.
cjpayne
Well-Known Member
OK. All I wanted,on this thread, was for anyone who saw this movie/documentary, to comment. THATS ALL!!!!!!!! I'm getting pissed at the comments towards kirrbby(anyone else is fair game). He's entitled to believe what he believes, just like anyone else. He's one of the best freinds you could have. If it wasnt for him, half the bikes(minitrails) in the country wouldnt even run.lol. When he comments on bikes or parts.....he's "da man". He has saved my ass SO many times when I couldnt figure out a problem. I really wish he was my neighbor. I dont care WHAT his political views are at all. He's my friend and always will be. I'm really getting sick of the division when we all have a common goal. Yes, our media has been lying to us for decades(IMO), but we cannot let it divide us. We need to stick together.................okay, I'll shut now.lol
joel1234567
Active Member
Fwiw, I did try to watch that but the link says the content was removed.
cjpayne
Well-Known Member
I dont doubt it. It was for free on Oddesey. but they want YOU to pay for it. Supposed to be going to theaters(around 400). It really is scary, from what I saw. If you do see it, just go with an opened mind. What I saw, there is alot to be scared about. If we dont have fair elections, we are screwed. I dont care who won, but what I saw, I want people hung. There were alot of people that fought and DIED for your right to vote. Any falsification of this by them, they deserve the worst, IMO.
cjpayne
Well-Known Member
Yep, you gotta pay for it, but here it is.
rumble.com
OFFICIAL MOVIE: 2000 Mules
This is the official 2000 Mules movie. Below are the instructions to purchase and watch: 1. Purchase the movie or an annual subscription at 2000mules.locals.com. 2. Make sure your email addresses on R
rumble.com
The 208
Active Member
Censorship. Not by the gov't but for the gov't. Same result. Just like the Hunter B laptop story being censored by twitter and being ignored by the major "news" outlets. That definitley had an effect on the outcome of the '20 election. But, the major "news" outlets tell us that it was the most free and fair election ever. Right. The only elections that are suspect are when an R wins.
Some people are ok with it as long is it's not "their guy." But left unchecked, soon it will be "their guy."
They don't censor hate speech, only speech they hate. And they gotta a lot of hate!
Some people are ok with it as long is it's not "their guy." But left unchecked, soon it will be "their guy."
They don't censor hate speech, only speech they hate. And they gotta a lot of hate!
kirrbby
Well-Known Member
Thanks CJ.
No worries tho. I'm the one who keeps putting myself out there for ridicule and such. But I can take all of that.
I've already embarrassed myself...more than twice, talkin politics...and talkin minibikes for that matter. I'm ok with all of it. Nobody to blame but me.
The 208
Active Member
Hey, wait a minute. A while back when 2000 Mules came out, wasn't it Politifarce.org and/or opinioncheck.org that said the movie was bogus cuz the cell phone tracking wasn't reliable or accurate enough. That's weird, cuz the NYT is reporting that the cell phone tracking works too well and can expose people that have been to abortion clinics. Hmm. That's really weird...