K and HK0's most, K and HK1's next..after that its a mixed bag. Me I prefer the '79's after the two series I mentioned.
So even though the KO has the crappy front forks, it is still among the best as far as value goes? I understand the HK's with the 4speeds, but I thought I read here somewhere that there were a lot more KO's than any other model?..
For me, if I were to choose my fave right now, I think it'd be the HK1.. 4 speed AND good forks..
Is there any downside to the 4 speed tranny? Are they as tough as the autos?
I read an old article somewhere that stated roughly a total of 500,000 CT70's were made and it was the second most produced motorcycle by Honda. 100,000 or (1/5th) of those were made in 1970 alone. 1970 was the high water mark of the mini trail craze. As far as rarity and desirability, it's all subjective depending on the collector. Clearly the 4 speeds are rarer and the production numbers are far fewer. In my opinion the HK1 is a hotter item seeing there were only around 25,000 made in only two colors. The HKO comes in second with roughly 65,000 made in three color options. KO's were mass produced from mid 69' to mid 71' and are easily found most anywhere. The early 69' silver tag KO's are some of the most sought after due to the fact that they were first made and have serveral differences over the later KO's that were cranked out in large numbers.
My ranked opinion is below. Some may argue that the Silver Tag KO should be number one and they would have a good point however, my opinion may be swayed due to the fact that I own both a HKO and HK1. Perhaps and Silver Tag will be the next to add to my list.
1.) HK1
2.) HKO
3.) KO (silver tag)
4.) KO
5.) K1
6.) K2
------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have to go with the SilverTag first .
2nd - HKO
3rd - HK1
4th - KO / K1 & then the 79 .
I read an old article somewhere that stated roughly a total of 500,000 CT70's were made and it was the second most produced motorcycle by Honda. 100,000 or (1/5th) of those were made in 1970 alone. 1970 was the high water mark of the mini trail craze. As far as rarity and desirability, it's all subjective depending on the collector. Clearly the 4 speeds are rarer and the production numbers are far fewer. In my opinion the HK1 is a hotter item seeing there were only around 25,000 made in only two colors. The HKO comes in second with roughly 65,000 made in three color options. KO's were mass produced from mid 69' to mid 71' and are easily found most anywhere. The early 69' silver tag KO's are some of the most sought after due to the fact that they were first made and have serveral differences over the later KO's that were cranked out in large numbers.
My ranked opinion is below. Some may argue that the Silver Tag KO should be number one and they would have a good point however, my opinion may be swayed due to the fact that I own both a HKO and HK1. Perhaps and Silver Tag will be the next to add to my list.
1.) HK1
2.) HKO
3.) KO (silver tag)
4.) KO
5.) K1
6.) K2
------------------------------------------------------------
I'd have to go with the SilverTag first .
2nd - HKO
3rd - HK1
4th - KO / K1 & then the 79 .
Kinda reinforces the point that it's really a matter of personal opinion trumping everything else and that one of the big dividing lines is collectibility vs rideability.
I'm certain an all original 69' KO silver tag would draw the most money if sold. I do however, wonder which (equally restored HKO & HK1) would sell higher. It could depend on the color. Owning both, it's clear to me which rides better and the handful of improvements and changes make the HK1 the break out winner.
Kindof like comparing a 67 Big Block Vette to a 2010 ZL1. While some would argue that the 2010 is a better car with all of it's "refinements" There is just NO replacement to the hot floorboards, leg burning sidepipes, and overall feel, "stiff" ride, and sounds the 1967 has.
On the CT front I own a early HKO and a K3 with the nice front shocks, if I rode these things from a sheer comfort standpoint the K3 would be the choice, but the 4 speed is hands down the funniest bike to ride! There is my .02 worth of Opinion.
Kindof like comparing a 67 Big Block Vette to a 2010 ZL1. While some would argue that the 2010 is a better car with all of it's "refinements" There is just NO replacement to the hot floorboards, leg burning sidepipes, and overall feel, "stiff" ride, and sounds the 1967 has.
On the CT front I own a early HKO and a K3 with the nice front shocks, if I rode these things from a sheer comfort standpoint the K3 would be the choice, but the 4 speed is hands down the funniest bike to ride! There is my .02 worth of Opinion.
------------------------------------------------------------I don't have a clue about the overall value of these things and if I did I would have been in a tight pickle a long time ago. I feel these things are priced on pure emotion. :loco:
BJ, could not aggree more on the description of the 67'. Drive like a tank, and give you a headache driving them for to long, but in my opinion nothing can even come close to the sound and the response when you hit the pedal.:77:
--------------------------------------------------------------Mike bring this Vette to Mid-Ohio and give us ALL rides in it! LOL
------------------------------------------------------------
Jim ,
I have a 2007 Vette that rides better then some family cars , gets almost 30 mpg (6 spd) on the road . If you ever get down my way , I'll take you for a ride . It has 550 HP at the wheels & looks & drives pretty much stock . I think you will be very surprised at the new Vettes . Only thing you will owe me , if you mess in my seat ! :4:
-------------------------------------------------------------I have a line on a '74 CT, blue in color. Looks pretty clean, and has a title. I like the fact that it has "real" forks. I have not actually gone to look at it in person just yet, but from the photo's it looks to be all there.
The owner is asking 925.. Decent deal?