So I need to wire in a jumper basically?
So I got the regulator spliced in. I'm still unsure about the yellow wire from the stator it's not hooked up to anything. Thank you for your help.
I installed a Lifan 110cc on my K0. The yellow wire connects to the main bike harness. It hooks AC power from the lighting coil (magneto) through the IGN switch then straight to the brightness switch and then to the headlight.So I got the regulator spliced in. I'm still unsure about the yellow wire from the stator it's not hooked up to anything. Thank you for your help.
Thanks Jon.This proves there are two ways to do the Yellow wire.
Adam-NLV is an experienced and skilled person, and his experience with the Lifan Yellow T connection is different than mine.
Jon Pardue
Florida
Home of the Pardue Brothers
Thanks Jon.
I never tried wiring it up like your diagram shows. On page II, your showing a jumper from the battery straight to the head light at the back of the ign switch and the C connector on the IGN switch is left unconnected. By jumping the IGN switch like that means your running the HL off the battery on DC.
That's new to me but that will work also.
I installed a Lifan 110cc on my K0. The yellow wire connects to the main bike harness. It hooks AC power from the lighting coil (magneto) through the IGN switch then straight to the brightness switch and then to the headlight.
That's how I wired my k0 and the lights work well.
This proves there are two ways to do the Yellow wire.
Adam-NLV is an experienced and skilled person, and his experience with the Lifan Yellow T connection is different than mine.
Yes,I wired mine on my bike and my wife's bike the same way Adam-NLV did utilizing a scothlock.It was clean and simple.The light stays very bright unless idle RPM is on the verge of stalling.Under normal circumstances the lights work perfectly and brightness is consistent.
It is very interesting that this system can be wired two different ways:77:
This proves there are two ways to do the Yellow wire.
Adam-NLV is an experienced and skilled person, and his experience with the Lifan Yellow T connection is different than mine.
Yes,I wired mine on my bike and my wife's bike the same way Adam-NLV did utilizing a scothlock.It was clean and simple.The light stays very bright unless idle RPM is on the verge of stalling.Under normal circumstances the lights work perfectly and brightness is consistent.
It is very interesting that this system can be wired two different ways:77:
Hmm, this all makes me review and wonder. Folks complaining of a dim headlight, maybe upgraded to a high Watt 12 Volt bulb, maybe had bad wiring and corroded connections, poor switches, or discharged batteries. Hard to know the details. A few clone engines have turned up having a 1/2 wave stator (stator has a grounded middle tap). Most have full wave stators (neither leg of the stator is grounded). This is a major difference between a clone, and a CT70's grounded center tap stator design.
Someone had two clone regulators, both looked alike, the common 4-terminal variety with finned case. One was marketed as a 1/2 wave, one was full wave, and they looked identical. The severe lack of documentation for most clone engines makes it a guessing game. My CT90 clone install was completed in 2002, and consumed hours sorting the wiring out. That is how I got started drawing these things... first the stock diagram, then erase the stock mill and install the clone engine. The drawings have helped explain to others.
Jon Pardue
Florida
Home of the Pardue Brothers
Sorry guys this is a long one
Hey Jon, I do like where your going with wanting to run the headlight on DC. It does have its advantages. For instance, the headlamp will last for years on DC, where as AC with all it’s positive and negative sinusoidal peaks burns them out periodically.
Before we get ahead of ourselves; lets review some of the design details of the late 1960’s Honda CT70 lighting coil & charging circuit.
As you already know, the lighting coil is center tapped in the middle and hooked to ground. S o effectively, we have two coils that are now sectioned off. One half of the coil is then designated for charging the battery and the other half designated for running the headlight.
If you disconnect the side that runs the HL and just hard wired it to the battery, then you have one half of the coil being used for charging the battery and powering the HL , Tail light, Horn & blinkers, while the other side of the coil is not used & left disconnected.
If you were driving on a dark country road, that wouldn’t be a problem but if your driving it in the city, where you start/stop blink while turning, that’s going to be pretty taxing on that circuit and eventually the battery won’t charge fast enough and will die along with all the lights.
You may ask “Well why do some modern bikes run their HL on DC?” Simply put; Full-wave rectification. In the late 60’s when these bikes were being designed, silicon semiconductors (diodes) were extremely expensive, not available for civilian use and probably classified at that time.
So instead of taking 4 Orange tin-can selenium diodes and making a full bridge rectifier from those, (which would have been expensive, cumbersome and power robbing) Honda instead, opted for a single selenium tin-can diode and used that to charge the battery and an UN-rectified circuit (AC) to power the headlight. An ingenious solution! Chalk one up for the Japanese.
So what’s the solution to a dimming headlight in a 6 volt 1970’s technology Trail bike?
Simple; Silicon is cheap now days and so are full bridge rectifiers. Grab two of them (yep it will take two because the lighting coil is center tapped into two coils as discussed previous and as you already know) and full wave rectify both circuits.
The other solution is to accept the fact that old technology has its downside and the HL will dim when the engine’s RPM’s is low.
Once again let me reiterate; It's nice to see someone else interested in this stuff besides me.
Thanks Jon P
Here's the circuit.Omitted: no dual full wave rectifiers. I do not grasp how two full wave rectifiers will do any good if one AC input is ground (chassis) referenced, then the ground output is also ground (chassis) connected. I did not draw up two full wave rectifiers, but will do so if you are interested to see why I don't think that works quite right with just one "ground" connection. You would need a floating ground to get the benefit, which is do-able, but complex.
Here's the circuit.
Do the head light bridge first( B1). Get that one going, that's the easy one. Notice my humps and nodes. On the anode of D4, B1 that's an erased line but it still showed up. The anode of d4 is the neg- to the HL That's a node but it didn't show up.
Get the book: Basic electronics by GROB. bet u can get it on eBay or Amazon real cheap.
THe anode of the diode is the line side not the triangle. You got a learning curve to get through, Use google , it's a great tool for looking up tech stuff.
If you don't have a O scope, I'd suggest you get one. Just voltage measurements aint gonna cut it. I have a Tektronix 2235.
The charging bridge circuit is gonna be the bitch of the bunch (B2). I'll help you w/t grounds but do the HL first.
View attachment 20385
I was trying to be helpful not insulting.Your inference I should pick up a primer on electronics to learn where a rectifier anode is located indicates you are being rude, or maybe you wish to attempt to insult me. Your comments seem negative and immature.
Omitted: no dual full wave rectifiers. I do not grasp how two full wave rectifiers will do any good if one AC input is ground (chassis) referenced, then the ground output is also ground (chassis) connected.