Bush sr.'s 1st Iraq war was justified by obvious reasons and also was accepted by a large majority of the international community. Iraq obviously attacked Kuwait after claiming false evidence that they had every right to do so.
Germany's history taught (most) Germans that it is not only a human right, but merely a duty defending peaceful states attacked by neighbours with faked matters for selfish reasons.
Most German's understanding of WW2 is that the German regime (besides their insane belief of racial superiority) - overburdened by internal economic and social problems - nevertheless backed by powerful industries with not enough customers buying their high-tech products - found it easier to blame others for their internal political problems instead of trying to solve them. They therefore created what they thought enough false evidence supported by a huge propaganda industry to entitle them to attack innocent states to steal their industrial resources (Germany attacking Poland as an "act of defense", the start of WWII).
Although I doubt there is enough historical and emotional distance from Bush jr.'s 2nd Iraq war: does anybody see any parallels?
Of course I wouldn't go as far and call Saddam Hussein "innocent". Nevertheless it is and was quite clear that most of this war's moral "justification" was just faked. Might explain why many countries refused to take part and even more are still refusing to clean up the mess behind the US.
but really the germans have lost nothing today because last time i checked they hold most of the tech and money still to this day. as it should be.:argue:
Germans have lost a lot during WWII. Roughly 5 million people (soldiers and civilians), which is close to 10% of the population back then. Most houses destroyed beyond repair. No industry left. Most of everything left worth anything (be it patents, inventions, machinery, money, engineers or what else) taken away for reparation claims.
Anyway, it was their own fault. They didn't deserve otherwise.
Nevertheless, it taught German society a different view to things.
Still a lot of distrust in leadership concentrated into one single person. A true belief that you don't serve your country by serving a single leader. No understanding for unconditional support to a leader after his election.
But still deep thankfulness that they were lend a chance to rebuild their country after WWII instead of being sacrificed to the Russians (basically a US merit).