1979 CT70 with modified front collapsible Frame

Adam-NLV

Well-Known Member
1979 CT70 in good condition.

Pretty neat modification lets you disconnect the forks for easier transport. Innovative idea but I would have kept the color all Bright Yellow instead of the black. Still pretty cool.
Has title in Reno NV.

Honda Ct | eBay
 
As an eBay Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

b52bombardier1

Well-Known Member
This is a re-do on the idea of a CT90 Suitcase Cycle but I have never seen it done on a 70.

Rick

2006 Honda Foreman - Green
1973 Honda ST90 - Mighty Green
1974 Honda CT90 - Shiny Orange
1975 Honda ST90 - Topaz Orange
1976 Honda CT90 - Mars Orange
 

bc17a

Well-Known Member
Here's a 70 done with a single bolt for a quick disconnect. It popped up for sale a few years ago.
 

Attachments

  • ct1.jpg
    ct1.jpg
    30.7 KB · Views: 90
  • ct2.jpg
    ct2.jpg
    40.7 KB · Views: 101
  • ct3.jpg
    ct3.jpg
    39.3 KB · Views: 99

69ST

Well-Known Member
I've seen about a dozen of these conversions on the `bay, since 2000. The latest model was an `80-`82 ( can't recall the specific year). Word has it that the conversions were done somewhere toward the left coast, until the CT70 went "out-of-production" after `82.

Could turn into an "original-aftermarket" series of machines, like dealer-modded musclecars of the same era...with a small, cult-like, following.
 

Adam-NLV

Well-Known Member
I've seen about a dozen of these conversions on the `bay, since 2000. The latest model was an `80-`82 ( can't recall the specific year). Word has it that the conversions were done somewhere toward the left coast, until the CT70 went "out-of-production" after `82.

Could turn into an "original-aftermarket" series of machines, like dealer-modded musclecars of the same era...with a small, cult-like, following.

Yep, When comparing the size of today's production cars vs yesteryear's, you could see why this modification would come in handy.

The concern I have is the proper alignment of the two halves. I would suspect the front has to precisely track with the rear 100%.
While this 79 modification was obviously done by a skilled craftsman, I cringe to what would happen at an amateur attempt (like me) to try this cut frame conversion.

I could do the electrical part of it but....OMG wow. Lol!
 

Enginedoctor

Well-Known Member
...I would suspect the front has to precisely track with the rear 100%….


ha! i can imagine a screw up on that one. your trail 70 would dog track down the road. it would probably have to be off significantly for that to happen. and you could hack a little bit, by adjusting the rear wheel cockeyed (which would kill your chain and sprockets) and then turning right or left perpetually just a tad...
 

OLD CT

Well-Known Member
The ad mentions original so much I want to PUKE! Ah ,the stories this bike can tell that involves the border of Mexico and a airplane. Hmm?
Border patrol/DEA is still looking for the guy last seen on that bike...
 

Adam-NLV

Well-Known Member
Ah ,the stories this bike can tell that involves the border of Mexico and a airplane. Hmm?
Border patrol/DEA is still looking for the guy last seen on that bike...
The new owner might want to check inside the seat, maybe the seat foam isn't all foam!
lol
 

69ST

Well-Known Member
ha! i can imagine a screw up on that one. your trail 70 would dog track down the road. it would probably have to be off significantly for that to happen. and you could hack a little bit, by adjusting the rear wheel cockeyed (which would kill your chain and sprockets) and then turning right or left perpetually just a tad...

If the plate steel used for the welded-in coupling is heavy enough, the frame should be straight. Think about it, even if the cut was several degrees off, from the desired 90-degrees (from the frame CL)...it's a single cut and both sides match exactly, like jigsaw puzzle pieces. Would've been easy enough to make a welding jig and since these conversions went on for a number of years, the guy doing them would've been nuts to not have a jig.

Only part of the conversion that concerns me is the structural strength of the coupling, itself. That tab/slot and single bolt don't strike me as being comparable to the original, unmolested, frame...which gets its structural strength from its configuration, like unibody construction with a car. For the record, I'm not a structural engineer...won't even portray one on TV. I do, however, lean toward overkill when it comes to mechanical durability. IOW, I could be way wrong on this one.

OLD CT said:
The ad mentions original so much I want to PUKE! Ah ,the stories this bike can tell that involves the border of Mexico and a airplane. Hmm?
Border patrol/DEA is still looking for the guy last seen on that bike...

Awwww...c`mon Pat, don't sugar-coat it, tell us what you really think. FWIW, I agree with you on the annoying verbiage. Not everyone can write decent ad copy and it has consequences.
 

Dezdan

Well-Known Member
Well, it didn't sell again listed at $1400 BIN - though it was ended early. However, its back, now on CL with a new owner and a CA title: 1979 HONDA CT70 2,100 Orgional miles Funny, the CL ad is reusing the eBay photos, even though 200 miles have been put on it, the new seller reused a photo of the old mileage.

I noticed the original ebay seller is a member on here now, maybe he can fill in some details...
 
Last edited:
Top